Showing posts with label Action. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Action. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 17, 2020

Bloodshot (2020) movie review


Overall verdict: 6.5/10

The Good: Intense action, cool chase scenes, easy to follow story, good looking characters

The Bad: generic music, inconsistent special effects, shallow narrative, tons of wasted potential, underdeveloped characters

***********Review***********

A professional soldier, killed in action, and brought back to life as a technologically augmented one man army. He soon rebels against his creators and seeks to rediscover his humanity while being hunted down by similarly augmented antagonists. Sounds familiar? That’s UNIVERSAL SOLDIER, and BLOODSHOT is exactly that kind of throwback to the early 90s era of sci fi blockbusters where the protagonist is cast more for his muscles than his acting, where scientists have hidden agendas, some megacorp is involved and there is always this geeky techie type comic relief.

BLOODSHOT is not the most original of movies, but it has its charm. The action is spectacular for a film of its budget. Standouts include a stylish shootout in a tunnel flooded by flour and lit by red flares, a wild street chase through London suburbs, and a crazy three way melee on the side of a skyscraper. The premise is an intriguing one with tons of potential but it is all wasted thanks to the very generic execution.

So Vin Diesel plays Ray Garrison, our titular enhanced dead soldier, just like every other Vin Diesel character in all his gravely baritone, muscular body toned glory. Not much in the way of acting there if you are just playing the same character type just with a different profession. After being bought back to life by a seemingly benevolent inventor Doctor Emil Harding of the Rising Spirit Tech company, Ray meets fellow cyber augmented soldiers, starts to remember his death and murder of his wife at the hands of a villain, then breaks out of RST to track down said villain and use his nanotechnology enhanced abilities to exact his revenge.

But things are not all as they seem and this is not a spoiler since the false memories and Ray being unwittingly manipulated into carrying out assassinations by perceiving them as revenge were all blatantly advertised in the movie’s trailer. While the build up to the big twist is done relatively well, it ultimately feels over simplified and boils down to a series of decisions by a supporting character that comes out of nowhere. From then on, it is one generic cliche after another. Clear good and bad guys, no shades of grey, just a simple almost Saturday Morning Cartoon-like approach to the overall narrative.

Generic too is the music accompanying the action. Just search up “action packed trailer music” online. The result is exactly what Composer Steve Jablonsky’s tunes for this movie sound like. To his credit, it at least sounds different from his scores on Transformers which nearly all of his post-2007 action movie works sound like.

Although I praise the action, the special effects either lack consistency or look rehashed from other movies. The exosuit augmentations worn by the RST experiments? They look like similar exo suits from EDGE OF TOMORROW. The nanomachines enabling Ray to instantaneously heal any injury? It’s the same dark grey particle effects seen in TERMINATOR GENISYS for the T3000. There are scenes where digital doubles are used for more dangerous stunts and these are plain obvious in the unnatural way they move and the city skyline shots showing the CGI RST building does not look good.


A better creative team could have elevated this movie into something special. Maybe play a little more to it’s throwback nature by embracing the excesses or early 90s sci fi. Or perhaps not oversimplifying a narrative with great potential. What if Bloodshot truly cannot tell the difference between what was real and what was implanted memory? What if the whole ordeal with RST was a complex gambit upon a gambit scheme by the comic relief techie guy to take down Doctor Harding? Keeping such things open to interpretation, having a more clever script that is not dumbed down, could have elevated BLOODSHOT to the level of classics like TOTAL RECALL. It’s attempts at any deeper themes like exploring what drives Ray to keep fighting, or the hints that there may be a darker side to Ray’s past and his purpose for becoming a soldier in the first place, they are all merely mentioned and nothing is done with them. Not developed, not subverted, just mentioned.

One of the big draws of the classic sci Fi movies is the talking points they raise surrounding the themes and concepts in those movies. Fans keep talking and discussing and dissecting, leading to the movie being remembered long after its release. BLOODSHOT is neither here nor there. Too shallow to achieve long term cult status, too derivative but without that self awareness to pass off as a homage, and to my understanding it deviates a lot from the original comic source material to even pass off as a straight adaptation. It is a simple Vin Diesel action movie with superficial thrills, great action, good looking stars and little else beyond that.

***********Review***********

Entertainment: A-
Story: C-
Acting: C+
Characters: B
Music: D
Replay value: B-
"Brains": C-


Friday, December 13, 2019

Rambo: Last Blood (2019) movie review


Overall verdict: 6/10

The Good: Emotionally impactful, terrific acting, excellent music, explores the plight of illegal sex trafficking victims.

The Bad: shoddy editing, mediocre filming style, small scale action, ultimately fails to give proper closure.

***********Review***********
On first viewing, RAMBO: LAST BLOOD feels like an unnecessary sequel, undoing the near perfect closure that 2008’s JOHN RAMBO gave us. In terms of scale, it is certainly the “smallest” Rambo movie and one chock full of issues.  But after a while it sunk in how much like a Rambo movie this is.
RAMBO LAST BLOOD seems like a deconstruction of Rambo 3 the same way i felt JOHN RAMBO was a deconstruction of Rambo 2. Rambo has accepted a peaceful life in the countryside when someone personally close to him embarks on a dangerous Mission and gets captured. 
Rambo attempts a rescue, fails in the first attempt, gets hurt bad but bounces back, succeeds in the second, and there’s even a battle in an underground location. The only thing missing is the large scale land battle at the end. On a whole, it presents a more personal stake for John as compared to the last movie.
The deconstruction comes in how the familiar scenes play out from Rambo 3 and the dark twists they take. Rambo infiltrating an enemy stronghold: you’d expect him to get in, silently taking down all opposition, and then blow stuff up on his way out. But what you get is Rambo being left a broken bloody mess because he went in with no backup or prep. The rescue? You’d expect a tense running battle and Rambo successfully extracting the captive. But what you get is a somewhat uneventful drive home that ends in tears. If anything, this movie rivals FIRST BLOOD in terms of personal tragedy for John Rambo making Rambo 3 seem like a cartoon in comparison. 
The movie itself does what past Rambo films do: bring attention to a social issue overlooked by mainstream media. In the first and second it was the plight of Vietnam veterans, in the third it was the afghan people, the fourth was the conflict in Myanmar. In this one, it’s the illegal cross border prostitution by Cartels. There are parallels drawn between this modern “war” and wars of old such as the abuse of the kidnapped girls mirroring the demeaning treatment of POWs, or the strike against Rambo’s ranch being this flipped call back to the Vietcong’s infamous use of tunnels against foreign troops.
While I love the sometimes too real performances by the various actors, particularly Stallone’s more vulnerable take on Rambo, along with the aforementioned deconstruction and the themes, RAMBO LAST BLOOD is far from a perfect movie. The performances are often marred by the director’s obsession with having the camera way too close to the characters’ faces for no apparent reason. Camerawork is nothing special and lacks any “wow” factor.
The overall look and feel of the movie resembles a direct to video sequel at best. The opening forest rescue in the storm is murky dark probably to hide the sub par CGI used for the avalanche and flood. Same goes to any other sequence that relies on CGI like computer generated explosions straight out of a tv show. For the action scenes, they typically consist of quick cuts and shakey cam along with some scenes where the footage was obviously sped up to make the stunts look more impactful. Again, it feels small, shuttling back and forth between Rambo’s ranch, a Mexican border town, and back again.
Not helping matters is a slip shod editing of the movie. You can have a scene developing, building tension, like when Gabriella is wandering deeper into gang territory across the border and then it suddenly cuts to a totally unrelated scene of Rambo tending to his horse for like 20 second before cutting back to Gabriella. New characters like an undercover reporter with a personal grudge against the Mexican cartel gets introduced half way and then forgotten by the third act.
All these factors combined makes this only my second least favourite Rambo movie just ahead of RAMBO 3. It makes up for the less emotional JOHN RAMBO and I can understand how overriding the happy ending of that movie with this movie might upset many fans. For me, I just wish this movie was given to a more competent director and production team. I liked it, but I definitely did not need it.
***********Review***********


Entertainment: C+
Story: C-
Acting: A-
Characters: B+
Music: B+
Replay value: C
"Brains": B-

Saturday, March 16, 2019

Polar (2019) movie review


Overall verdict: 6.5/10

Nothing to do with our melting ice caps

The Good: Stylish action, memorable characters, great acting, lots of dark humour

The Bad: cliched plot, lack of character development, clashing tone

***********Review***********
With a title like “POLAR” you’d imagine something set in the chilling arctic circle or on freezing Antarctica. While snow does feature in some scenes, this movie has nothing to do with the frigid imagery a title like POLAR conjures up. Instead, POLAR may be describing the movie’s tone and style; a mixture of 2 very different tones literal polar opposites of each other.
On one hand, we have the plottings of the deliciously decadent and devious Mr Blut, played by Matt Lucas (Alice in Wonderland), who runs his own hitman-for-hire organization called Damocles. He’s a greedy nut, Mr Blut is, and plans to inflate his company’s value by killing off all retiring hitmen before they retire so that he would not have to pay their pension. To do this dirty work he enlists a new team of colorful crazy assassins, each one as weird as the next almost to the point of being caricatures. Scenes involving Blut or his assassins are shot in this saturated brightly coloured style calling to mind parodies and R Rated cartoons.
On the other hand, we have retiring hitman Vizla aka the Black Kaiser, played by Mads Mikkelsen (Hannibal) one of the best in the business. And he’s days from retirement and his fat pension payout. Vizla’s subplot meanders a bit in the first act showing his failed attempts at reintegrating with normal society, being a good neighbor to the timid Camille, played by Vanessa Hudgens (High School Musical)  and taking up regular jobs or hobbies, often with darkly humorous results. His scenes, mostly confined to a snowy mountain town, are nearly devoid of colours other than stark white and varying shades of grey and brown.
Once Vizla is finally tracked down and cornered, the action is swift and very satisfactory. We see how Vizla’s old fashioned ways and experience outsmart and overpower the new assassins’ gimmicks and flashy tactics. The action and the way it’s shot is the high point of this movie. That and the inherent craziness of what Vizla is up against separates this movie from the whole “retired badass forced into a new fight and winning by his experience” genre that seems overdone in a film market trying to cash in on the popularity of the TAKEN and JOHN WICK franchises.
If you can get over the clashing styles of gritty and cartoony, POLAR is a cool albeit cliched movie. We have seen it all before with this movie being light on plot and light on developing its main character beyond the simplest single statement character description of “retired hitman who can’t reintegrate”. It is however great fun, never boring, and full of that dark humour that I love.
***********Review***********


Entertainment: A-
Story: C-
Acting: A
Characters: B-
Music: C-
Replay value: B+
"Brains": C-

Monday, July 3, 2017

The Mummy (2017) remake review


Generic Tom Cruise action movie about Tom's hot stalker

Overall verdict: 5.5/10

The Good: Comedic timing between Cruise and Johnson, incredible performance by Russell Crowe, genuinely eerie creature designs and effects, decent action, sets up greater shared universe with other films.

The Bad: uninspired directing, dark murky cinematography, not scary, shallow narrative, lacks any deeper themes, convoluted plot that is not resolved well, underdeveloped antagonist, bland protagonist


***********Review***********
The Mummy heralds the genesis of Universal Studio's very own shared cinematic universe, christened the "Dark Universe". And boy they weren't kidding! Directed by writer Alex Kurtzman in his directorial debut, has coated the entire movie in a murky light dimming filter. Daylight scenes look muted and dull without strong shadows, serving no conceivable thematic purpose other than to have a darkness filter over everything. Kutzman's barely serviceable directing style, with its constant shaky cam, close ups, tight shots and slightly off focus action scenes, all point to a director acting off a checklist of "typical action movie shots". To make matters worse, most of the action scenes are set in dark underground locales or at night, which requires much strain to make out what is going on.
Not that it is entirely a bad thing. This darkness does serve the horror element of the movie. After all this is a remake of the classic horror movie franchise "The Mummy" which saw one remake by Stephen Sommers done in more of a classic swashbuckling adventure style. The big twist this time is that the mummy is a lady.
Ahmanet was an Egyptian princess who was denied her rightful place as ruler of ancient Egypt. She made a pact with the God of chaos, Set, to get revenge on her family and in turn she would bring Set into the world through a chosen individual so she could rule by his side. She was found out and mummified alive as punishment, far away from Egypt. Five thousand years later, rogue soldier Nick Morton and his pal Chris unwittingly discover Ahmanet's tomb in the middle of the war torn Iraqi desert. Unknown to Nick, Ahmanet is still alive in her sarcophagus and uses her arcane magic to manipulate events and people into bringing her body to London. There she hopes to find an ancient weapon belonging to Set, and Nick is the key to her plan.
Unfortunately it is a stretch to call this a horror movie. The darkness of the footage does attempt to convey the look of a horror film, and the effects are hauntingly good. The scenes immediately after Ahmanet resurrects as a desiccated anatomically twisted mockery of humanity are particularly effective as is the look of the zombies. But other than that, this movie has more in common with an action comedy than a horror. 
Though the make-up and effects are meant to be scary, the way scenes are set up, shot and scripted end up more hilarious than horrific. A shocking moment where forgettable love interest Jenny accidentally barges in on Ahmanet straddling a captive Nick, surrounded by rotting minions and about to perform an arcane ritual on him, is scripted as if she barged in on a couple making love. Or when Chris is cursed and haunts Nick as a disembodied spirit bearing the scars of his death, it is played less like a spooky spectral encounter and more like one of those Scary Movie parodies.
Nick himself is a standard morally ambiguous, selfish,arrogant, snarky, action movie protagonist and his sarcastic partner is the standard comic relief. Tom cruise and Jake Johnson as Nick and Chris have great chemistry making the action very fun to watch. Simplicity seems to be the order of the day and any character who was not a monster is portrayed as a one dimensional archetype. In a grave misstep, the script decides to try and develop the already uninteresting Nick and this takes time away from developing the titular mummy Ahmanet. Only Russell Crowe's Dr Jekyll was able to hold my attention and be an interesting addition to the dark universe.
A part of that intrigue comes from Crowe's performance and the stark contrast in the Jekyll and Hyde characters. Unlike past portrayals, Jekyll and Hyde here do not look much different aside from some CGI details. Crowe's performance gets the credit for selling this contrast and comes off as genuinely unsettling. I had hoped to see more of his character in this movie or future ones.
I also liked the gender flipped premise of a dude in distress chased by a female undead necromancer as well as the amount of world building that went into crafting this shared cinematic universe. And perhaps that is where the problem lies: this movie succeeds in being enticing for what is promised rather than what is delivered. Too funny to be a horror, too bland to be a comedy, THE MUMMY succeeds in setting up a new shared cinematic universe but fails to exploit its full potential and fails in delivering a professionally made movie that stands on its own.

***********Review***********


Entertainment: B-
Story: B
Acting: B+
Characters: C-
Music: C-
Replay value: B-
"Brains": D

Saturday, November 19, 2016

Suicide Squad (2016) Movie Review



Overall verdict: 6/10

The Good: Amazing chemistry among cast, perfect portrayal of comic book characters, well written dark humour, intense action.

The Bad: Mediocre music, uninspired directing style, garish cinematography, erratic pacing, shallow narrative, never delves into deeper themes.

3D Readiness: Post production 3D conversion. Murky cinematography and frantic camera work do not translate well to 3D

*************Review*************
Villains get the spotlight in SUICIDE SQUAD, a movie which is in as much of a dismal situation as its protagonists with an almost bipolar personality caused by an indecision on a proper tone or themes. What could have been a gripping ensemble piece about camaraderie among unlikely companions forged in the fires of conflict becomes yet another loud, messy, superficial blockbuster affair. A movie about second chances and an exploration of the minds behind the monsters that are these supervillains dials back on all this potential depth in the name of making itself more “fun”.
From the get go, SUICIDE SQUAD had a tall order to tackle. It had to introduce not one, not two, but a whopping 9 characters into this cinematic universe called the DC Extended Universe or DCEU. Not only that, they had to go from bad guy to good guy and settle their individual character arcs within the span of 2 hours. This is a team movie but we had barely known the team members. In a flurry of disjointed flashbacks and flash forwards, we are brought up to speed on the history of our characters leading up to their current situation as patsies recruited by the ruthless Amanda Waller (Viola Davis) to be a black ops task force in the service of the government. Marksman Deadshot (Will Smith), mutated strongman Killer Croc (Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje), self-blaming pyrokinetic gangster El Diablo (Jay Hernandez), master of ropes Slipknot (Adam Beach), crazy Aussie with a pony obsession (it makes sense in context) Captain Boomerang (Jai Courtney), crazier little psychopath Harley Quinn (Margot Robbie), all led by the stern no-nonsense Captain Rick Flagg and his sword wielding assistant Katana.
Immediately apparent is the tremendous chemistry among the cast. Each role is masterfully played and feel exactly like the comic book brought to life. Of particular note are Margot Robbie as Harley Quinn and veteran Will Smith’s Deadshot. The respective actors nail the various facets of these complex characters perfectly, portraying them as layered individuals hiding their inner brokenness behind a façade of bravado and false smiles. That being said, only Deadshot and Harley get any decent development. The others are relegated to being a supporting cast with barely an arc much less any character depth. A pity though, seeing as how colourful a cast it was, and how intriguing their backstories from the comics were.

For their first mission, the squad is sent into Midway City to investigate an apparent terrorist attack. Instead what they find is a supernatural invasion like something out of Ghostbusters. Faceless humanoid zombie things roam the streets while special effects mumbo jumbo continually pours out of a peculiar train station. Slowly it is revealed that there is more to this attack than meets the eye which seems to have a personal connection to one of the squad. But first, they would have to fight their way across the city in some of the messiest, uninspired fight sequences filmed in recent years all set to a bland generic score and shot in a haphazard manner with each frame saturated in garish purple, oily blacks and acid green.

Oh and the Joker (Jared Leto) is in this movie somewhere, appearing occasionally throughout the movie like a wheezing Wiley Coyote intent on saving his lost love Harley. We really do not get much about him other than he is a mob boss, kills people, and has a disturbing as heck chuckle.
SUICIDE SQUAD is muddled by erratic pacing for the most part, brought about by the sloppy editing that looks more like a music video and less like a movie. Perhaps that was the point when they packed the film full of pop songs from likes of Eminem, Rick James and Skrillex; it is a feature length compilation of music videos in which the characters actually stop for an intermission to get a drink right in the middle of a war.

Here is a movie that is unable to decide on its identity, no doubt brought about by the executive meddling that plagued its production. It feels like it was originally a much darker, sombre, character centred movie. Such a film would have been more in line with Director David Ayers’ style, having done the brutal war movie Fury. Instead, it is pumped full of dark humour which, though well executed, takes away any complexity or meaningful themes that the movie could have incorporated. It is so superficial that even the camaraderie comes out of nowhere. One moment they are complete strangers, and all of a sudden they are best friends. A character claims that the squad is his new family but nowhere do we see them truly bond.

SUICIDE SQUAD is saved mainly by the amazing actors and actresses, bringing our favourite comic book villains to life in a way that makes us want to know more about them, their histories, and their stories. They bring a tremendous energy to the screen and snippets of the characters’ development and how the varying personalities play off each other are sprinkled throughout the film. Perhaps if it was not mercilessly butchered by editors, SUICIDE SQUAD had potential to be a great ensemble piece digging deep into an exploration of the criminal psyche and a tragic tale of loss and redemption. Instead it was re-cut into a shallow comedy filled mess with bland directing, murky production design, and ended up with the trailers being better than the movie itself.

*************Review End*************

Entertainment: B-
Story: C-
Acting: A
Characters: B-
Music: C-
Replay value: B-
"Brains": C-

Saturday, June 4, 2016

X-Men: Apocalypse (2016) movie review


Overall verdict: 7/10

A disappointing villain and lack of thematic depth overshadows the fun, action packed conclusion to the second X-men trilogy.

The Good: fantastic acting, top notch special effects, rousing soundtrack, paves the way for, easy-to-follow straightforward narrative, well written script with witty humour 

The Bad: lack of excitement in battle sequences, dated stunt work, shallow superficial characters, plot points seem repeated from previous movies

3D Readiness: None

*******Review******


The word "apocalypse" brings to mind an end-of-the world event of biblical proportions. X-MEN APOCALYPSE brings to mind some Japanese anime and a yearning for the better X-men movies of the past. The third in this "new trilogy" that began with X-MEN FIRST CLASS, the franchise reached its high point in the epic X-MEN DAYS OF FUTURE PAST but now tips back down to a rather typical tale of good vs evil intertwined with the usual hero's journey. Thankfully the masterful execution of dialogue and acting chops saves this film from sinking into mediocrity.

Our story begins Ten years after the mutant Magneto aka Eric Lensherr nearly murdered the president on national television only to be foiled at the last instant by fellow mutant shapeshifter Mystique and his former Friend and psychic Charles Xavier. Now Eric has settled in a life of isolation with his new Wife and child, Mystique has become a legend among the mistreated mutant populace Travelling the globe to free mutants from abuse, while Charles has his school for young mutants up and running. His newest pupils are the aloof Jean Grey, a powerful telekinetic who can barely control her abilities, and the lonely Scott Summers who has been cursed with equally uncontrollable powers that fire laser beams from his eyes. Mystique breaks up an illegal mutant fight club in Germany and rescues a young teleporter, cursed with a blue devilish appearance, named Kurt Wagner. So........do you follow me so far? Great, because into all of these plot threads comes Apocalypse, an ancient Egyptian mutant able to manipulate inanimate objects on a molecular level. He awakens after a Long sleep and seeks to re-establish his godlike status in the world.


That is a lot of plot threads. Fortunately or unfortunately it does not require much inferring or complex thinking to follow the story. It is very simple and it is in its simplicity that it loses out on the richness of character than past xmen movies had. Our characters are all reduced to two dimensional archetypes each with familiar story arcs. So familiar in fact that the whole movie is a pastiche of plot points taken from past xmen movies. Eric is the grief stricken blood knight who goes evil with vengeance when tragedy strikes, again. Scott jean and Kurt are the inexperienced loners who have to work together to overcome their challenges, a little like pyro, Bobby drake (ice man) and kitty pryde (shadow cat) in X-men 2. Mystique replaces wolverine as the badass wanderer who is thrown into a leadership position to guide our young loners. Xavier is once again captured and the X-men's home base is compromised, again like X-MEN 2. Powerful mutant with delusions of godhood and a gang of loyal followers is Apocalypse this time replacing magneto's role in the first 3 xmen movies. Call it homage or call it cliche, I feel that this story manages to toe the line between familiar and fresh. The familiar elements gives us a sense of the revolving nature of conflict, that history repeats despite the best intentions. The fresh elements of course add new facets to a film which could have otherwise been a complete bore, thanks to the slow burn nature of the plot which mostly sees both good guys and bad guys gathering their key players for the final showdown. Those who can appreciate a slow build up would love this while those who need their immediate action fix would be left disappointed.


Divisive might be the best word to describe this movie. When the action does come, it is a special effects spectacle of mutant powers on display where everyone.......pretty much stands around shooting things at each other. Oh look, the villain is getting the upper hand! Let's shoot more! Where physical stunts and fights come, they are a thrill to behold except the dated wire work which feels artificial. Interspersed between these divisive battles are particular scenes of movie magic. Quicksilver (last see in DAYS OF FUTURE PAST) returns and we get to see the full extent of his powers once again only on a larger scale. And at least this time he has a purpose in the story other than being a just a miraculous attempt. But as mentioned earlier his motivations are touched on but not explored. His character is simplified into yet another archetype.


Beneath the visual spectacle, the movie under utilises its cast of characters. Ty Sheridan's Scott Summers could have been great as the new audience surrogate, going from meek bullied loser to taking his first steps as confident leader of the X-Men. Instead he is also shoved into the background after his introduction. Kodi-smith mcfee's more feline looking Nightcrawler is also another intriguing character sidelined. Instead we get more Charles xavier and more Eric playing out their character drama like star crossed lovers. Don't get me wrong, they are fantastic actors, especially Michael Fassbender completely nailing the tragedy of Eric's character arc. But their story came to a decent close in the last movie and this one just feels like more of the same.

Apocalypse himself is a villain that is as equally divisive as the movie itself. On one hand, it seemed that the creators were going for the "all powerful but frail" type of villain ala emperor Palpatine of Star Wars. The snake-like menace that Oscar Isaac exudes through his sinister delivery is betrayed by a design that borders on corny. Oversized platform boots, plastic looking Armour and an ill defined set of powers all downplay the threatening presence of the villain. His motivations could have been much deeper. A commentary on modern commercialism replacing the religions of old perhaps as the new "cult following"? Or a criticism of humanity's arrogance and self glorifying nature? Maybe even a critique on how common folk are quick to idolise mortal "false gods" of the influential and powerful? No, no and no. None of that thematic depth here. Apocalypse is merely your Saturday morning cartoon variety villain who wants to destroy the world to rebuild in his image.

It is not a bad movie per se. Visually stunning, an easy-to-follow plot and well cast characters set to a script filled with witty dialogue that does not overdo the comedy. The acting is professional and the music by John Ottman is a grand thematic continuation of But for a grand finale it pales in comparison to films like X-MEN 2 by glossing over its deeper themes of social commentary especially, in the treatment of mutants as an allegory to prejudice against social minorities. It lacks the urgency, high stakes tension and emotional depth of DAYS OF FUTURE PAST and the chemistry among the cast is no where near XMEN FIRST CLASS. I would place it as a middling entry into the X-men franchise that succeeds in opening the doors to a whole new generation of X-men movies.
*******Review End*******

Entertainment: A-
Story: C
Acting: B+
Characters: C-
Music: B+
Replay value: B+
"Brains": C+